After an injury plagued summer, the world’s real number one tennis player is on the comeback trail. Rafael Nadal plans to return for the Rogers Cup in Montreal, beginning on August 8th. With the tournament being the U.S. Open tune-up, it’s no secret that Rafa has his sights set on his first title at Flushing Meadows and achieving the career Grand Slam– winning at all four major tournaments in a lifetime – at age 23, the feat recently accomplished by 27 year old Roger Federer at the French Open.
Federer, who finally regained his ranking as the world’s number one player after winning at Wimbledon in Rafa’s absence, must once again prepare to face one of the few players who dominates him, and Nadal’s timing may be perfect. Last year, by the time Nadal reached the U.S. Open after winning the French Open, Wimbledon, gold at the Summer Olympics, and the Rogers Cup, he was completely burnt out. Perhaps the forced rest due to tendinitis in his knees will provide him with enough energy to play the U.S. Open at peak form. If so, the end of the summer has the potential to be very exciting for Tennis fans around the world.
With only three days remaining until the 2009 Wimbledon final, two gargantuan story lines hang overhead. Most of the world is watching Roger Federer to see if he will set the all-time record for tennis Grand Slam Championships with his 15th, but the host, Great Britain, will not be on side. The Britons’ hopes and dreams have been saddled on homegrown Andy Murray’s shoulders, and with good reason.
The fourth seeded 22 year-old Murray sports a 6-2 record against the first seed, the most lopsided record any current player can claim on Federer. Murray has only once before met the Swiss superstar in a Grand Slam final, and this came at the U.S. Open final last year. Unfortunately, after beating the world’s best player, Rafael Nadal in the semi-finals, Murray succumbed to the pressure of playing in his first Major final, failing to play his best, and losing the match in straight sets.
The locals are perhaps hoping that the set-back was a touch of fate, as it prepared him to win his first Major tournament in a much more dramatic fashion – on his home court in front of his own people. Murray, in an interview with Ian Baker from the official Wimbledon website, certainly thinks so,
“I feel like I'm ready to win a Grand Slam now, whereas last year I might not have been. But I understand how difficult it is.” If he manages to do so, it would make Andy Murray the first British man to win at Wimbledon in 73 years, since Fred Perry accomplished the feat in 1936. In England, there is a sentiment that the win would be as important to their country as when they captured Football’s World Cup in 1966.
Murray’s story has become larger than life in Britain, and the pressure on him is enormous. One can’t help to wonder how he will respond as he looks into the crowd and hears thousands chanting his name. Neil Harmann of the Times Online asked him about reacting to the pressure, and Murray replied,
“It is on the court where I feel most comfortable. I really don’t feel the weight of expectation, it’s the last thing you are thinking about when you are hitting your first serve of the match. When it comes down to it, playing in front of 15,000 people on Centre Court at Wimbledon is what I want to do, that’s the part of your job you enjoy the most.”
Murray’s head appears to be in the right place as he heads into his Friday semi-final match against the sixth-seeded American, Andy Roddick. The resurgent Roddick will provide a formidable foe and he could be just the medicine to round Murray’s game into form, so that he is ready to face the formidable Federer in the final. The British certainly hope it is.
So often we hear that Roger Federer is a wonderful ambassador for the sport of tennis, a wonderful role model. But, I ask you, besides being the best tennis player in the world, would you be happy if your son grew up to be like him? Here are some exhibits of his character, you can make up your own mind:
A Humble Winner?
Every time Federer wins a Grand Slam tournament, he falls to the ground crying as if he's been shot, as his opponent awaits him patiently at the net, watching the show. 
Gracious in Defeat?
Upon losing the 2009 Australian Open to Rafael Nadal, Federer cries as he watches the trophy being handed over to the champion. For a man who’s had so much success, you’d think he could allow someone else to enjoy his moment.
Modesty?
When Federer finally won his first French Open in 2009, this was his answer upon being asked how Nadal has made him a better player:
"I don’t know how much... but I think I have actually helped the other players more than they have helped me because I have put tennis in a different league."
So much for admitting one's shortcomings and acknowledging greatness in others. All I know is that my household will be a Federer free zone. I don't want my children growing up with a sobbing wreck of an idol.
And he will come out flying. Why? Because in Rafa’s world, every point is played as if it were the most crucial point of the match. Cynthia Gormely, writer for the New York Times has written an article on Nadal’s ascent to number one, and through her research she speaks with a number of people close to Nadal, including the only man who has ever coached him, his uncle Toni. In explanation of his unyielding
ferocity, he says,“From the time Rafael was little, he’d win that first point of the match, which nobody ever pays much attention to, and he’d yell, ‘Vamos!’ All pumped up. Let’s go! And you play like you train. As he grew up, he got used to training as though each point were the last one.”
Throughout Nadal’s life, uncle Toni has been much more than just his tennis coach, he has been a mentor, not only a consultant for matters of sport, but of how to live life the right way, how to be a good person. Toni doesn’t have rules that must be obeyed, he has simply let Rafa learn the correct way to conduct himself. Asked if he has ever instructed Nadal not to smash and break a tennis racket during a match, Toni responds,
“He knows he can’t throw a racket. He just knows. As far as I’m concerned, it’s shameful when he orders a meal and doesn’t finish it. Understand? Same thing with rackets. These rackets cost money.” Such strong character and values, Toni believes, will foster the ability to be the best. “If that player is brought up courteous, brought up as a respectful person, he’s got a better chance to reach the championship… because it’s going to be easier for him to accomplish the hard work.”
Uncle Toni began this process with Nadal 20 years ago, when the young lad was only 3, but don’t be fooled into thinking that any three year old given a racket and life lessons can achieve such greatness. Toni had no preconceived designs on creating a champion out of Rafa.
“He was at the club one day, and I handed him a racket, we had some little ones, and then tossed a ball at him.” Upon seeing the ball impressively returned over the net, Toni thought to himself, “ ‘O.K., this is not normal.’ His feet, especially, the way he’d move himself into good hitting position when I tossed balls at him. This is a rare thing in a child.”
Tennis was not Nadal’s only sport growing up – in fact, it was soccer that was his primary passion, and it was perhaps in soccer where the first signs of his fighting instinct were first seen. Another of Nadal’s uncles, his father’s youngest brother, Miguel Angel, played soccer for the Spanish national team, and he recalls how Nadal used to play the game of “keep away” or “pig in the middle”: “He liked being the middle. We’d all do our tricky maneuvers to try to get the ball past him. Any one of a hundred little kids, you do those kinds of moves on him, he’ll start crying. But Rafa, no. He’d keep fighting to get the ball.”
Combining a killer instinct, strong character values, and perhaps an even more impressive skill-set is what makes up the magnificent game that Rafael Nadal displays on court today. And make no mistake, his game is just as overwhelming as his will. According to Gormely’s article, three years ago a San Francisco based tennis researcher, John Yandell, conducted a number of tests on different players to determine how much ball spin they generate off the face of their rackets. Speaking about Nadal’s forehand, he said,
“We’ve measured the spin rates on the forehands of quite a few of the top players, including Nadal, (Roger) Federer, (Pete) Sampras and Andre Agassi. The first guys we did were Sampras and Agassi. They were hitting forehands that in general were spinning about 1,800 to 1,900 revolutions per minute. Federer is hitting with an amazing amount of spin, too, right? 2,700 revolutions per minute. Well, we measured one forehand Nadal hit at 4,900. His average was 3,200.”
All of this spin translates directly into why Nadal has established himself as the greatest clay-court tennis player of all time. On the sport’s grippiest surface, where the bounce off a spinning ball is exaggerated immensely, a cross-court forehand drive from Nadal bounds off the ground with a higher trajectory than that with which it landed, ending up well above the strike zone of most right-hander’s backhands. Not only are opponents pinned far behind the baseline in the mere attempt to return this shot, it is almost futile to try to generate any sort of power or direction off it, which usually results in a short backhand return. It is this high spin forehand that can set up a point in one shot, as Nadal can switch instantly to the offensive even if he just hit five defensive shots in a row. Now imagine you’re Roger Federer, stationed well behind the baseline, expecting that forehand to come hurtling, and Rafa hits a slice or a drop shot. Because of where you were standing to combat that forehand, you have to sprint an extra five feet just to get to the ball near the net, which, due to the grippy clay, has not travelled towards you at all, and has bounced only two inches off the ground.
Although historically the slickest surface in tennis, the grass courts at Wimbledon have been changed in the last seven years or so. These days, the strength and density of the grass is so robust that players say it is second to only in clay in terms of grip. A fact that surely played into Federer’s 2008 demise at the hands of Nadal. Although he won all his five Wimbledon championships on the newly slowed court, he was not ready to battle Nadal, who had finally learnt how to play on the speedy hard courts, making the medium speed Wimbledon a natural transition to take the defending champion’s crown.
Upon receiving his winner’s trophy at the 2009 Australian Open, the last time Federer and Nadal faced off in a Grand Slam match, Nadal said to his opponent, “You are a great champion. You are one of the best of history.” Such soft spoken appreciation for Federer’s reign came mere moments after a performance that would later reduce Federer to tears.
Following a surprising early exit from the French Open, mere weeks ago, Nadal has some uncertainty heading into Wimbledon. Recently diagnosed with tendonitis in both knees, he announced that he would be resting them in order to make himself ready to defend his title.
And with that the fiery pitt-bull with the line-backer’s build prepares for the upcoming fortnight. According to French tennis commentator Phillippe Bouin,
“Every tennis lover would like, someday, to play like Federer, but every man wants to be Rafael Nadal. Which is different.”
While most men understand that they will never be able to command the court like Nadal, striving to be as good a person is just as tall an order.
Note: All quotes from Uncle Toni, Miguel Angel, John Yandell, and Phillippe Bouin were taken directly from Cynthia Gormely’s article. The assertions and viewpoints voiced here are inspired by her piece, but not necessarily shared by her. If you would like to read her article, click here.
